Narendra Modi । নরেন্দ্র মোদী

One of the heavy costs that Narendra Modi is paying for staying in power is disowning the strongest of biases of his parent organisation, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) – to which he swore everlasting loyalty when he joined it in his teens. He also retracts, ever so stealthily, from the principle of his political guru, V.D. Savarkar of the Hindu Mahasabha, even as he never misses a photo opportunity to worship him publicly.

Though Narendra Modi and his cohorts swore before the elections that they would surely cross 400 seats, it was clear during the different phases of polling that the INDIA bloc parties would certainly do well. The new-found unity among the opposition parties had evoked enthusiastic popular support.

During the UPA years, 2004 to 2014, Narendra Modi, CM of Gujarat, led the brigade of States on each and every issue that he felt militated against the federal structure of the Constitution. Thus, when he was elected prime minister of India in 2014, we had naturally expected him to strengthen the rights of states and were certain that he would take away several controversially acquired powers of the Centre.

In 1967, when I was just 15 years old, I was attracted to Ram Manohar Lohia’s brand of desi socialism that targeted the nexus between caste and class in India. The Congress had been in power for 20 years and appeared quite invincible. But socialist leaders such as George Fernandes, Madhu Limaye, Rabi Ray and Kishen Pattanayak believed that the mighty Congress could be dislodged.

The INDIA front, that Narendra Modi and his acolytes had scornfully dismissed as divided and doomed, had managed to give the Bharatiya Janata Party a real fright, with its 237 seats so perilously close to the BJP’s 240.

ভারতের শেয়ার বাজারে গত ৪ জুন যে পতন হয়েছে, তেমন ঐতিহাসিক পতন বিগত চার বছরে হয়নি। একদিনে শেয়ার বাজার এতটা পড়েনি। শেয়ার বাজারের সূচক হল সেনসেক্স ও নিফটি। যে মুহূর্তে খবরে প্রকাশ পেল যে অষ্টাদশ লোকসভায় ভারতীয় জনতা পার্টি নিরঙ্কুশ সংখ্যাগরিষ্ঠতা না পাওয়ার দিকে এগোচ্ছে, সেদিন সেই মূহূর্ত থেকে সেনসেক্স ও নিফটিতে প্রায় ৫ শতাংশ পতন শুরু হল।

As I switched on the TV for a brief while to watch Narendra Modi’s third swearing-in ceremony, my mind flashed back to his first, in 2014. I was a bit nervous as I was sure to be the fall guy, as the CEO of Prasar Bharati, if any glitch occurred in the television and radio coverage. A few days earlier, he had alleged that Prasar Bharati had mischievously cut off parts of his last interview on Doordarshan.

মনে থাকবে। ১৯৬৭, ১৯৭৭ বা ২০১৪-এর লোকসভা নির্বাচন যেমন ইতিহাসে অন্যতম চাঞ্চল্যকর নির্বাচন হিসেবে স্থান পেয়েছে ঠিক তেমনই স্মরণীয় হয়ে থাকবে এই ২০২৪ সালের লোকসভা নির্বাচন। কোনও সন্দেহ নেই মোদি জামানার পরিসমাপ্তির সূচনা ঘটল এবারের নির্বাচনে। এই দেওয়াললিখন তাঁকে ভবিষ্যতে কতটা সতর্ক করবে তা ভবিষ্যতেই বলবে।

History will look back at the 2024 elections to the 18th Lok Sabha as an exciting landmark— somewhat like 1967 or 1977 or even 2014. There is no doubt that it marks the beginning of the end of the Modi era, though one cannot predict how badly he may react to the writing on the wall or how or viciously he may tighten his stranglehold over a battered democracy. It is a major blow to Narendra Modi’s ego and his hold over his flock that he has fallen 32 seats short of the absolute majority figure of 272 seats.

What started as a completely one-sided election has slowly but surely turned into an interesting one, with all sorts of possibilities. Liberals, rationalists, pluralists, democratic, leftists and all others who have not accepted a regime that is openly opposed to these values enshrined in the Indian constitution have suffered repeated defeat, demoralisation and humiliation for 10 long years.

মোদিজি হয়তো এটা দেখে খানিকটা বিস্মিতই হয়েছেন যে, জানুয়ারি মাসে রামমন্দির নির্মাণকে কেন্দ্র করেই হোক, কিংবা এই এপ্রিলে রামনবমীকে ঘিরেই হোক, বাঙালিকে তেমনভাবে উৎসাহিত হতে দেখা গেল না। উত্তর ও পশ্চিম ভারতে এসব নিয়ে যেমন উৎসাহ-উদ্দীপনা দেখা গিয়েছে, পশ্চিমবঙ্গের ছবি তদ্বিপরীত। বঙ্গ-বিজেপি চেষ্টার খামতি রাখেনি। খোলা তলোয়ার প্রদর্শন থেকে শুরু করে আগ্রাসী শোভাযাত্রা, বাদ ছিল না কিছুই।

When Narendra Modi attacked Rashtriya Janata Dal leader Tejashwi Yadav recently for violating the ‘strict norm’ of vegetarianism during the Ram Navami period, he was directly inciting voters in the northern Hindi belt, and of course, in adjunct areas like Gujarat.

Nothing could sum up better the transactional relationship between big capital and authoritarian rule than these words of William E. Scheuerman, Professor of Political Science at Indiana University in the ‘Boston Review’, under the catchy title Why Do Authoritarians Win?

In the last three years, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has introduced and carried through, with lightning speed and his brute majority in parliament, a series of legislations that choke or restrict our freedom of expression, information, data and their transmission. We have reasons to believe that the apparatus of a surveillance state has been grafted, stealthily but surely,

When PM Narendra Modi sent out his closest bureaucrat, Nripendra Misra, from the PMO to Ayodhya to head the Shri Ram Mandir Construction Committee in February 2020, he was clearly signalling that Ram Mandir was his highest priority.

The unseemly haste and rough manner in which Prime Minister Modi and his Communications Ministry rushed through the Telecommunications Bill in the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha not only reveals their muscular, majoritarian psyche but also the regime’s apathy towards (or fear of) debate.

It took everyone by surprise when Narendra Modi, who never spares a trick to ‘elevate’ his standing, decided to deliberately ‘downgrade’ his social status and assert forcefully and unambiguously that he belongs to a socioeconomically backward caste. After years of studied silence on his caste status, Modi decided to claim the OBC mantle and attacked the Congress mercilessly for “hating” him for it.

Some MPs say that a bulletin must have been issued but most of us seem to have missed it, if at all one was sent. Thus, till the afternoon before, no one knew for sure whether the entire apparatus of the parliament of India would shift, lock, stock and barrel, to the reportedly-swank new building next door on September 19.

There is no doubt that the increasing politicisation of the bureaucracy has been corroding, for quite some time, the pillars on which fair and efficient administration rest. The pains taken by the founding fathers of our constitution to protect and insulate the civil service from political interference had ensured a large degree of neutrality, for several decades — except perhaps during the Emergency. What is more important is that it created a culture of looking down at any suspiciously close liaison between politicians and bureaucrats (for mutual personal gain) to be illicit and adulterous.

As the Modi government’s much-hyped ‘Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav’ ( immortal celebration of our independence) gathers momentum, one is likely to fall prey to two impressions that are sought to be conveyed. The first is that the present regime is more firmly wedded to the principles of nationalism than others and the second is the utter devotion with which it remembers the nation’s struggle for independence.